Theory for Running a Better Marathon: Part I by Casey Shafer
A thought is running through my head on the concept of how to run a better marathon. Only recently did I put this thought into a theory. This theory should apply to every type of runner when training for a marathon. The thought all started because of Eric Ade. I have the utmost respect for my training partner and the dedication he has for grinding out training. This year was hard for me to see how Boston turned out not only for him, but for the many masses who trained incredibly hard for weeks on end, only to be let down on race day. For many runners this frustration can put a damper on your outlook toward running which affects your mood, training, and routine for many weeks to come.
If you are one of these people, then you may want to consider my theory. Run two marathons in a training cycle instead of one goal marathon at the end.After all, it works for many other distances. When training for a 5k or 10k, you run multiple time trials or some even have a season where you race every weekend for months at a time. This simple question of running more races is more complicated than it looks when dealing with the marathon. The marathon is harder for recovery because the distance is longer. The marathon is harder to stay healthy when training because you have to do more. The marathon takes more out of your body and mind. It just takes so much time. These are consistent ideas that I’ve heard when talking to people about this mythical beast of a race, but do these people feel this way because they haven’t tried multiple marathon training? The essence of the concept should be the same. Multiple marathon training is applying the concept of being fit and ready to go the distance at any time from week 12 to 20 of a training cycle. Just because you are ready to go the distance doesn’t mean you have to go the distance, and this key concept is sometimes lost in the glory of exceptional training. You start feeling so good that you want to do everything all the time, which can lead to trouble. Being well prepared with planning can improve your performance and experience so that any given day you “could” step on the line and shine. Planning two marathons with adequate understanding of your recovery time and planning to stay dedicated to the entire training time needed on a day to day level, can lead to a better experience.
The reason for two marathons is mentally and physically important. Mentally, setting yourself up for one race is a massive time investment for only one chance to achieve purpose. The odds are slim on everything going perfect your first marathon because the longer the race distance, the more factors can affect performance. Poor weather reports can side track the mental preparation needed for positive race performance. When conditions change runners start swaying from their original trainingplan. Many runners start making alternate strategies for the race, which is helpful for the given day of the marathon, but not helpful for the best marathon experience. By selecting two marathons chances, are increased of toeing the line with your ideal concepts intact, ready to conquer whatever challenges your personal goals. Running two marathons gives the mind a better opportunity to get satisfaction, which is one key to running a better marathon. Better doesn’t always mean faster, for some, better can mean a better age group time, a better personal performance, better experience of not walking (or not walking as much); which is why this theory applies to beginning and experienced marathoners alike.
As for the physical aspect, training and conditioning yourself to experience the feel of finishing the 26.2 miles is important. Theories on how many long runs you need and how long you need to run as your long run are abundant. My theory isn’t going to cover my philosophy on training plans for a marathon; it’s more a theory on planning to train for two marathons. Talk to any marathoner and they will tell you about their experience from miles 18 to 24. It’s been my experience through personal trials and through talking with other runners over the years that something happens during these miles, sothe more physically prepared you can be, the better the experience. When it comes to training, most programs prescribe longer runs so beginning marathoners should look one of the two marathons as another long run that will help you physically prepare to reach your goal. Experienced marathoners should look at both marathons with equal preparation. Physically the first marathon is helpful because you learn how your body responds to the mileage. You can assess where your training is strong and where you lack, which gives an opportunity to change your process to address the training goal. Feeling out the distance is important and relate it back to a season of running. The first 5k race of a season and the last 5k race are usually very different because the body is physically prepared to understand what is expected of it after completing that distance. The same holds true at the marathon, but recovery is more important. For some the first marathon may be perfect. Another advantage of two choices is what I am dubbing the “celebratory marathon.” Using this method for running a marathon means if you get a perfect expectation right the first time, then the second marathon becomes a different reason to run.
Marathon selection process comes into play to help with running a better marathon. Two marathons help with race day conditions and the type of race experience. Some races are gigantic like the top five: Chicago, London, Berlin, New York, and Boston; which have harder entry requirements and prestige. I personally call these “glam-athons” because of the hype and prestige of attending one of these big time races. A glam-athon has ups and downs because the commitments are set well in advance before starting training. As fabulous as finishingthe big dance and partaking in the post-race festivities, these races put extra pressure,which may not match up with your personal reasons to run the marathon. Sometimes the positive change you experience during training for a marathon combined with a negative outcome of the race leads to hatred of the distance. Glam-athons have the crowd, which helps in having someone to pace with along the way. It also means more weaving and wasting energy in the early parts of the race. Likewise smaller marathons have positives and negatives, too. Smaller races don’t always have the aid station quality or support of spectators watching the race. The scenery and excitement of smaller races don’t compare to glam-athons, which may be good or bad.Picking two different types can enhance toward a positive experience because when it comes down to it, it’s best to understand what characteristics help you, combined with having the right conditions. Regardless of which type of race you run, a marathon distance is a prestigious accomplishment in and of itself.
Overall, this is a theory. There are many other variables I still need to discuss, like how running two marathons can help with event simulation. Figuring out how many nutritional items to take, which to take, what apparel to wear, how light of a racer or even to go with a racer or not, are all questions that can be experimented with in training and put into application during the first marathon. This knowledge is invaluable when it comes to running a better marathon, which is the point of why I believe two is better than one. As always, I am available to discuss this theory here at 3 Rivers Running Company. Look for part II coming soon.





